MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2063368412 · doi:10.1017/s0013091501000773

STURM–LIOUVILLE PROBLEMS WITH BOUNDARY CONDITIONS RATIONALLY DEPENDENT ON THE EIGENPARAMETER. I

2002· article· en· W2063368412 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicSpectral Theory in Mathematical Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsSturm–Liouville theoryEigenfunctionLambdaEigenvalues and eigenvectorsMathematicsOscillation (cell signaling)Mathematics Subject ClassificationBoundary (topology)Boundary value problemCombinatoricsMathematical analysisMathematical physicsPhysicsQuantum mechanicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We consider the Sturm–Liouville equation $$ -y''+qy=\lambda y\quad\text{on }[0,1], $$ subject to the boundary conditions $$ y(0)\cos\alpha=y'(0)\sin\alpha,\quad\alpha\in[0,\pi), $$ and $$\frac{y'}{y}(1)=a\lambda+b-\sum_{k=1}^N\frac{b_k}{\lambda-c_k}. $$ Topics treated include existence and asymptotics of eigenvalues, oscillation of eigenfunctions, and transformations between such problems. AMS 2000 Mathematics subject classification: Primary 34B24; 34L20

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it