Moreno's multiple ethnoterritorial concurrence model: A re-formulation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Luis Moreno has argued that ethnoterritorial politics in Spain is best explained by a model of multiple ethnoterritorial concurrence. This article re-formulates the model in a way that makes it a helpful heuristic tool for understanding territorial politics in other multinational states with decentralized structures such as Canada and Belgium. The discussion of the two cases suggests that this re-formulated model provides a framework for understanding Canadian federalism in relation to the dynamic produced by the interactions between Québécois nationalism, Western regionalism and Native nationalism, as well as the relationships between Belgium's sub-national units and their effect on territorial institutions. Notes Spain does not call itself a federation but many specialists of federalism consider it a federal state. See, for example, Ronald Watts (1999 Watts Ronald (1999) Comparing Federal Systems Kingston Institute of Intergovernmental Relations: McGill-Queen's University Press 2nd edition [Google Scholar]). Federal states are states where the division of political power between levels of government is specified in a constitution. This is the case for Spain, as the Spanish constitution of 1978 not only opens the way for the creation of Autonomous Communities, but lays out (in articles 148 and 149 respectively) their powers and those of the state. Other scholars prefer to call Spain a 'highly decentralized regional state'. See, for example, Ferran Requejo (2001 Requejo Ferran (2001) Political Liberalism in Multinational States: The Legitimacy of Plural and Asymmetrical Federalism in Alain-G. Gagnon and James Tully (eds.), Multinational Democracies Cambridge Cambridge University Press pp.110–32 [Crossref] , [Google Scholar], p.118). This last characterization still allows for a comparison with Belgium and Canada. See, for example, François Rocher, Christian Rouillard and André Lecours (2001 Lecours, André. (2001). Regionalism, Cultural Diversity and the State in Spain. Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development, 22: pp.210–26[Taylor & Francis Online] , [Google Scholar]). The degree of influence of centralizing forces on territorial politics depends, of course, on the dynamic of a particular case. The data of Bernier, Lemieux and Pinard show that in 1970, 34% of Quebeckers identified first and foremost as Canadians (as opposed to French-Canadian or Québécois), and that this figure dropped to 16% in 1977 and has hovered around this mark since then.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it