MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2063429952 · doi:10.1021/jp801306x

Aqueous-Phase Room-Temperature Synthesis of Gold Nanoribbons: Soft Template Effect of a Gemini Surfactant

2008· article· en· W2063429952 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSurfactants and Colloidal Systems
Canadian institutionsNational Institute for NanotechnologyWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanorodMaterials scienceAqueous solutionX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyTransmission electron microscopyPhase (matter)Chemical engineeringAmmonium bromideSoft chemistryPulmonary surfactantDiffractionNanoparticleBromideColloidal goldNanotechnologyAqueous two-phase systemChemistryOpticsInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gold (Au) nanoribbons were synthesized in aqueous phase under ambient conditions by using dimethylene bis(tetradecyldimethyl-ammonium bromide) (14-2-14) as a capping agent as well as a soft template. A two steps seed-growth (S-G) method was used. The first step of S-G method mainly gave nanorods of high aspect ratio along with nanoparticles of other shapes, but the next step produced mainly fine Au nanoribbons of several micrometers long, 50–150 nm wide, and ≈5 nm thick. They were characterized by transmission electron microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, energy dispersive X-ray, and X-ray diffraction analysis. Isotropic liquid crystalline phase of 14-2-14 provided a soft template effect and derived nanorods of high aspect ratios toward nanoribbon formation at room temperature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.824

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it