MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Ethnic origin determines the impact of genetic variants in dopamine receptor gene () concerning essential hypertension

2004· article· en· W2063437882 on OpenAlexaff
Joachim Beige, A. Bellmann, Arti Sharma, R GESNER

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Hypertension · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHormonal Regulation and Hypertension
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlleleEssential hypertensionMedicineAllele frequencyInternal medicineSingle-nucleotide polymorphismPolymorphism (computer science)EndocrinologyGeneticsDopamine receptorReceptorGeneGenotypeBlood pressureBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dopamine receptor type 1 (DRD1) has been implicated in the development of hypertension in humans as well as in animal models of spontaneous hypertension. We screened the entire coding and promoter region of the human DRD1 receptor for polymorphisms to analyze their association with hypertension. The allele frequencies of two common single-nucleotide polymorphisms, A-48G and G-94A were determined in 493 hypertensive patients and 209 normotensive controls. Allele frequencies did not differ for both polymorphisms between the two groups (-48 G-allele in hypertension = 0.37; -48 G-allele in normotension = 0.36; -94 A-allele in hypertension = 0.14; -94 A-allele in normotension = 0.10). Our findings in these Caucasian patients are in contrast to a recent Japanese study that revealed a significant association of the -48 G-allele with hypertension. Thus, racial differences may play an important role concerning the association of variants in the dopamine receptor type 1 gene with essential hypertension.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score0.562

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of HypertensionSame topicHormonal Regulation and HypertensionFrench-language works237,207