Chronic intermittent hypoxia reduces ventilatory long-term facilitation and enhances apnea frequency in newborn rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ventilatory long-term facilitation (LTF; defined as gradual increase of minute ventilation following repeated hypoxic exposures) is well described in adult mammals and is hypothesized to be a protective mechanism against apnea. In newborns, LTF is absent during the first postnatal days, but its precise developmental pattern is unknown. Accordingly, this study describes this pattern of postnatal development. Additionally, we tested the hypothesis that chronic intermittent hypoxia (CIH) from birth alters this development. LTF was estimated in vivo using whole body plethysmography by exposing rat pups at postnatal days 1, 4, and 10 (P1, P4, and P10) to 10 brief hypoxic cycles (nadir 5% O2) and respiratory recordings during the following 2 h (recovery, 21% O2). Under these conditions, ventilatory LTF (gradual increase of minute ventilation during recovery) was clearly expressed in P10 rats but not in P1 and P4. In a second series of experiments, rat pups were exposed to CIH during the first 10 postnatal days (6 brief cyclic exposures at 5% O2 every 6 min followed by 1 h under normoxia, 24 h a day). Compared with P10 control rats, CIH enhanced hypoxic ventilatory response (estimated during the hypoxic cycles) specifically in male rat pups. Ventilatory LTF was drastically reduced in P10 rats exposed to CIH, which was associated with higher apnea frequency during recovery. We conclude that CIH from birth enhances hypoxic chemoreflex and disrupts LTF development, thus likely contributing to increase apnea frequency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".