Children Broadcast Program's Absence : Focusing on Animation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
우리나라의 방송물 중 미래의 주역인 어린이들을 위한 문화콘텐츠는 그다지 많지 않다. 경제적 개념으로 접근하여 공중파에서는 광고가 붙는 시청률 높은 프로그램에게 밀려 유아콘텐츠는 거의 없어진 것과 같다. 어린이 콘텐츠라는 문화를 단순히 경제적 논리로만 접근한다면 미래의 주역인 우리의 어린들의 정서적 정체성은 혼란에 빠질 것이다. 또한 이러한 현상이 계속된다면 언젠가 우리의 문화정체성은 몇몇 콘텐츠강국에 의해 잠식되어 미래 산업 중 하나인 문화산업의 성장은 기대하기 어려울 것이다. 실제 영국, 캐나다, 프랑스, 일본의 경우 많은 보호정책을 펼쳐왔으며 콘텐츠산업에 눈을 뜨기 시작하는 중국도 미래의 자신이 될 어린이를 위한 문화산업을 보호 육성하기 위하여 정부차원에서 정책을 시작하고 있는 상황이다. 우리나라는 영상콘텐츠가 미래 산업이라는 인식도 중요하지만 이전에 어린이 영상콘텐츠가 미래의 영상콘텐츠 산업의 초석이라는 점을 인지하여야 할 것이다. In television broadcasts, There is an acute shortage of children's content. Children's program has no place to exist because of economical approach. Popular program which is supported by advertisement spot on broadcast's table of program. Children will be leading part of our society. If this environment has lasted for long period, children will lose emotional and cultural identity. A few powerful nation of culture encroach our culture industry. Many nation such as England, Canada, France, and Japan implement protectionist policy for culture from the government. First of all, it should be appreciate children' content is foundation for future content industry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".