Aggregation of MAVS antiviral protein suggests a mechanism for increased type I interferon production in SLE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) often have increased type I interferon levels (IFN-I) and activation of IFN-inducible genes (IFN signature). Because IFN-I has a key role in both the innate and adaptive immune responses, it is believed that heightened levels of this cytokine and the many genes it regulates may underlie the immune hyperreactivity and autoimmunity of SLE. The mechanism of IFN-I hyperproduction in SLE is under intense study. An important lead has emerged from our laboratory implicating the RIG-I antiviral pathway as a possible cause. In particular, the mitochondrial adaptor protein MAVS is a key intermediary in the RIG-I/MDA5 pathway, where viral RNA triggers a conformational change in RIG-I, leading to MAVS activation with subsequent IFN production. It has been reported that MAVS may form large prion-like aggregates, which might stimulate IFN-I production in a potent and prolonged fashion. We wondered whether such aggregates might be detectable ex vivo in SLE patients, and whether they might play a role in the sustained increased production of IFN-I. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from patients fulfilling ACR criteria for SLE, from healthy controls, and from patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Mitochondrial lysates were prepared and MAVS aggregation was identified with a semi-denaturing agarose gel and confirmed by confocal immunofluorescent microscopy. Twenty-two of 61 SLE patients showed clear MAVS aggregation, with essentially all of their MAVS protein in a high molecular weight aggregated form. None of the RA patients and only three of 33 healthy controls had abnormal MAVS. Clinical data analysis revealed that 82.4% MAVS-aggregate-positive SLE patients (mean age 46) had anti-SSA antibodies, compared with 40% MAVS-aggregate-negative patients (mean age 44), P < 0.01 by chi-square. 64.7% aggregation-positive patients had active SLE disease (skin rash, arthritis, increased ESR, low C4, and active renal disease), while only 10% of the aggregation-negative patients had active disease. Our findings are consistent with the notion that activation of the RIG-I pathway through inappropriate or persistent MAVS aggregation may lead to increased IFN-I production, immune stimulation, and systemic autoimmunity in SLE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".