Frustrated fcc antiferromagnet<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Ba</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>YOsO</mml:mi><mml:mn>6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>: Structural characterization, magnetic properties, and neutron scattering studies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report the crystal structure, magnetization, and neutron scattering measurements on the double perovskite ${\mathrm{Ba}}_{2}{\mathrm{YOsO}}_{6}$. The $Fm\overline{3}m$ space group is found both at 290 K and 3.5 K with cell constants ${a}_{0}=8.3541(4)$ \AA{} and $8.3435(4)$ \AA{}, respectively. ${\mathrm{Os}}^{5+} (5{d}^{3})$ ions occupy a nondistorted, geometrically frustrated face-centered-cubic (fcc) lattice. A Curie-Weiss temperature $\ensuremath{\theta}\ensuremath{\sim}\ensuremath{-}700$ K suggests the presence of a large antiferromagnetic interaction and a high degree of magnetic frustration. A magnetic transition to long-range antiferromagnetic order, consistent with a type-I fcc state below ${T}_{\mathrm{N}}\ensuremath{\sim}69$ K, is revealed by magnetization, Fisher heat capacity, and elastic neutron scattering, with an ordered moment of 1.65(6) ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{B}$ on ${\mathrm{Os}}^{5+}$. The ordered moment is much reduced from either the expected spin-only value of $\ensuremath{\sim}3 {\ensuremath{\mu}}_{B}$ or the value appropriate to $4{d}^{3} {\mathrm{Ru}}^{5+}$ in isostructural ${\mathrm{Ba}}_{2}{\mathrm{YRuO}}_{6}$ of 2.2(1) ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{B}$, suggesting a role for spin-orbit coupling (SOC). Triple-axis neutron scattering measurements of the order parameter suggest an additional first-order transition at $T=67.45$ K, and the existence of a second-ordered state. Time-of-flight inelastic neutron results reveal a large spin gap $\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\sim}17$ meV, unexpected for an orbitally quenched, ${d}^{3}$ electronic configuration. We discuss this in the context of the $\ensuremath{\sim}5$ meV spin gap observed in the related ${\mathrm{Ru}}^{5+},\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}4{d}^{3}$ cubic double perovskite ${\mathrm{Ba}}_{2}{\mathrm{YRuO}}_{6}$, and attribute the $\ensuremath{\sim}3$ times larger gap to stronger SOC present in this heavier, $5d$, osmate system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".