MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2063500728 · doi:10.1109/nemo.2014.6995660

Broadband design of substrate integrated waveguide to stripline interconnect

2014· article· en· W2063500728 on OpenAlexafffund
Farzaneh Taringou, Thomas Weiland, Jens Børnemann

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsReturn lossStriplineInsertion lossMicrostripInterconnectionBroadbandBandwidth (computing)Coplanar waveguideWidebandTransmission lineMaterials sciencePlanarWaveguideOptoelectronicsElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringMicrowaveComputer scienceEngineeringTelecommunicationsAntenna (radio)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A broadband design of substrate integrated waveguide (SIW) to stripline interconnects is presented for the first time. The transition shows a wideband performance and, contrary to microstrip and coplanar waveguide circuitry, interconnects two planar transmission-line media that are both capable of medium-level power handling capabilities. Over a bandwidth of 18 GHz to 28 GHz (43.4 percent), the single interconnect shows a worst-case return loss of 24 dB and maximum insertion losses of 0.44 dB. For a back-to-back connection, the return loss reduces to 19 dB and insertion loss increases to 0.87 dB. All dimensional parameters are specified, and the design is validated by two commercially available field-solver packages. Moreover, field plots are presented that highlight the step-by-step mode conversion from SIW to stripline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207