MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2063535167 · doi:10.1353/vpr.2014.0035

Bram Stoker, Dracula and the Victorian Gothic Stage by Catherine Wynne (review)

2014· article· en· W2063535167 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Scott D. Banville

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian periodicals review · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGothic Literature and Media Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDraculaCriticismSacrificeTrope (literature)ArtLiteratureArt historyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Bram Stoker, Dracula and the Victorian Gothic Stage by Catherine Wynne Scott D. Banville (bio) Catherine Wynne, Bram Stoker, Dracula and the Victorian Gothic Stage (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013). pp. ix + 195. $80/£50 cloth. In this fine volume, Catherine Wynne takes an interdisciplinary approach to illustrating how Bram Stoker’s experiences as a theatre critic in Dublin, his experiences as business manger of the Lyceum Royal Theatre, and his relationships with Henry Irving and Ellen Terry led him to incorporate supernatural Gothic and melodramatic themes in Dracula. In chapters 2 and 3, Wynne discusses how Irving’s penchant for sacrificing and punishing women via what Ellen Bayuk Rosenman terms “melodramatic masochism” (qtd. in Wynne 79) is repeated in Dracula through the characters of Lucy and Mina, who were most often acted by Ellen Terry. In chapter 3, Wynne shows how Stoker uses Terry’s enactment of various forms of suffering and sacrifice to rehabilitate her public image and how he mirrors this victimhood in the fates of both Lucy and Mina. Whereas Irving and Terry use the sacrifice of women to punish and rehabilitate fallen women, Stoker instead uses the trope to interrogate the link between “violence and misogyny” in the late nineteenth century (77). Readers of VPR will be most interested in chapter 5, which makes extensive, intelligent use of Stoker’s periodical-based theatre criticism along with other contemporary theatre criticism to trace the evolving Victorian interpretation of Macbeth as a man corrupted by the three witches. Wynne shows how Stoker, as part of this reinterpretation of the nature of Macbeth’s character, uses much the same logic in constructing the Count’s character in Dracula. Here the interplay of Victorian Shakespearean scholar Edward Dowden’s research, Stoker’s reviews of Irving’s Dublin performances of Hamlet, Stoker’s reviews of other performances of Macbeth, [End Page 520] and reviews by other theatre critics help shape the audience’s reception of Irving’s 1875 and 1888 productions that figure Macbeth as predisposed to evil. Wynne argues that if we are to look for a model of Stoker’s vampire, it is not in the personal or professional relationship between Stoker and Irving but in the artistic and intellectual collaborations that recast Macbeth not as innocence corrupted but as dormant evil awakened. If there is a weakness in Wynne’s fine book, it is that scholars who specialize in one area, whether it be gender studies, periodical studies, or Shakespearean reception studies, may find that she does not treat those areas with enough nuance or depth. However, what is gained by her interdisciplinary approach more than outweighs any potential losses. Bram Stoker, Dracula, and the Victorian Gothic Stage does an admirable job of placing Dracula in conversation with the literary Gothic, supernatural Gothic, and melodramatic drama on offer at Irving’s Lyceum Royal Theatre. It also situates the novel in relation to the function of science, literature, and the theatre in “legitimizing brutality” towards women as a means of rehabilitating them (64). Finally, it provides insight into the role of periodical-based theatre criticism in crafting public perceptions of the supernatural Gothic and melodrama as well as in promoting the idea of Macbeth’s inherent evil, which is then transplanted into Dracula. Scott D. Banville Nicholls State University Scott D. Banville Scott D. Banville is the Lorio Endowed Professor of Languages and Literature at Nicholls State University where he teaches literature and digital humanities. He is the author of articles on Victorian literature and popular culture. He is currently working on a project exploring connections between Dracula and advancements in the science of observation. Copyright © 2014 The Research Society for Victorian Periodicals

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.073

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVictorian periodicals reviewSame topicGothic Literature and Media AnalysisFrench-language works237,207