MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2063536630 · doi:10.1021/cg101318p

Investigation of the Role of Nucleating Agents in MgO−SiO<sub>2</sub>−Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>−SiO<sub>2</sub>−TiO<sub>2</sub> Glasses and Glass-Ceramics: A XANES Study at the Ti K- and L<sub>2,3</sub>-Edges

2010· article· en· W2063536630 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCrystal Growth & Design · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGlass properties and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsNucleationMaterials scienceChemical engineeringCeramicAbsorption (acoustics)MineralogyChemical physicsCrystallographyComposite materialChemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report a X-ray absorption study at Ti K- and L 2,3 -edges to determine the role of TiO 2 content as a nucleating agent in glass ceramics. It is found that the local Ti environment is not modified with TiO 2 addition, indicating that medium range organization is responsible for its ability to promote internal versus bulk nucleation. We have identified a Ti coordination change between the nucleation front and the crystallized part of the glass ceramic. These changes correspond to conversion from 5-fold coordinated to 4-fold coordinated Ti in the remaining glassy part, resulting from compositional changes. This reveals that active sites for nucleation could be experimentally detected and that reorganization of the glass matrix during nucleation has a major influence on the ongoing nucleation processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it