Ammonia Pyrolysis and Oxidation in the Claus Furnace
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The modified Claus process is commonly used in oil refining and gas processing to recover sulfur and destroy contaminants formed in upstream processing. In oil refining, in addition to the typical modified Claus plant feed of H 2 S and CO 2, NH 3 is also often present. NH 3 is a process contaminant and must be destroyed in the front-end furnace of the modified Claus plant, otherwise, it poses a risk of poisoning the catalyst beds and plugging off downstream equipment because of the formation of ammonium salts. In this paper, the pyrolysis and oxidation of NH 3 was studied under Claus furnace temperatures and residence times. Experimental data was taken, and new reaction rate expressions were developed for NH 3 pyrolysis and oxidation. The derived rate expressions are outlined as follows: the NH 3 pyrolysis rate expression r = A exp(− E a / RT ) P NH 3 1.25, where A is 0.00421 mol s - 1 atm - 1.25 cm - 3 and E a is 16.5 kcal mol - 1, and the NH 3 oxidation rate expression r = A exp(− E a / RT ) P NH 3 P O 2 0.75, where A is 4430 mol s - 1 atm - 1.75 cm - 3 and E a is 40.0 kcal mol - 1 . The rate expression for NH 3 pyrolysis matched experimental data within 13% and matched well with published data. The rate expression for NH 3 oxidation matched experimental data within 10%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it