MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Interleukin 8 Expression in Human Myometrium: Changes in Relation to Labor Onset and with Gestational Age

2000· article· en· W2063630085 on OpenAlexaff
ELLIOTT C.L., SLATER D.M., William Dennes, Lucilla Poston, Phillip R. Bennett

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Reproductive Immunology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPreterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
Canadian institutionsWomen's Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyometriumGestationGestational agePreterm laborEndocrinologyMedicineInternal medicinePregnancyAndrologyBiologyObstetricsUterus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PROBLEM: Preterm labor remains the major cause of perinatal mortality and morbidity in normally formed babies. The mechanisms involved in the onset of preterm labor are poorly understood, mainly because the mechanisms initiating term labor remain ill-defined. METHOD OF STUDY: Human myometrial samples were collected at cesarean delivery from preterm (26-36 weeks gestation) and term (37-41 weeks) women. Women at term were either non-laboring or laboring. The expressions of interleukin-8 (IL-8) mRNA and protein were measured by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, respectively. RESULTS: The expression of both IL-8 mRNA and protein significantly increased in the term laboring group, compared with either the term non-laboring or preterm groups. Levels of IL-8 expression did not alter with advancing gestational age. CONCLUSIONS: The increased expression of IL-8 in laboring myometria at term supports the hypothesis that up-regulation of IL-8 has a role in the initiation of labor in association with an influx of neutrophils and the release of their collagenolytic enzymes into uterine tissues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Reproductive ImmunologySame topicPreterm Birth and ChorioamnionitisFrench-language works237,207