La parole du confesseur auprès des suppliciés (Paris, XVIIe-XVIIIe siècle)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RÉSUMÉ Notamment par l’interdiction au condamné des derniers sacrements et de la sépulture en terre consacrée, le rituel de l’exécution dans la France d’Ancien Régime paraît ambivalent et contradictoire en ce qu’il exclut le supplicié de la communauté religieuse, alors qu’un confesseur est pourtant admis à ses côtés. Les rapports entretenus entre la parole, le salut, le condamné et le confesseur deviennent ainsi fondamentaux pour comprendre les liens, dans la culture juridique, entre la justice du roi et celle de Dieu à l’époque moderne. Au carrefour de la littérature baroque, des archives judiciaires et des livres de pénitence et de consolation, se révèle la place que prend le confesseur depuis la contre-réforme dans les migrations du sacré judiciaire aux XVII e et XVIII e siècles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".