Pore pressure generation in sand with bentonite: from small strains to liquefaction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper examines the effect of small percentages of bentonite on pore pressure generation in loose sands, from small strains all the way to liquefaction. It relies on resonant column, static triaxial and cyclic triaxial tests conducted on specimens prepared by dry-mixing Ottawa sand and bentonite, at a skeleton relative density of 35% ± 5%. Two main variables are investigated: the percentage of bentonite (3% and 5% by dry mass of the sand), and the duration of the ageing period preceding shear (1 to 10 days). The presence of bentonite increases the shear strain needed to initiate the generation of excess pore pressures in resonant column tests; in cyclic tests it reduces the mean pore pressure generated per loading cycle and allows the specimen to sustain an increased loss of effective stress before liquefaction initiates, both effects contributing to an increased resistance to liquefaction. These effects are further enhanced with prolonged pre-shear ageing. Additionally, under static conditions, the behaviour of the sand is found to become increasingly stable as the ageing duration is extended. Given the role played by the ageing period, the effects observed cannot be simply ascribed to the increased bulk density of the specimens with bentonite. Instead, they are attributed to the pore fluid formed in presence of bentonite: a concentrated clay gel with solid-like properties. This pore fluid increases the sand's threshold shear strain, which is shown to have a strong correlation with the resistance to liquefaction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".