MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2063723916 · doi:10.3917/riges.392.0056

Place à la théorie des affaires comme guide de gestion stratégique de marché

2014· article· fr· W2063723916 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Normand Turgeon

Bibliographic record

VenueGestion · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBusiness Strategy and Innovation
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Savoir créer ou repérer les occasions d’affaires et éviter les multiples écueils posés sur le chemin de leur appropriation est requis autant des entrepreneurs que des gestionnaires. À cette fin, une théorie de l’existence de l’organisation en affaires – dite théorie des affaires de l’entreprise – est un outil de base dans l’élaboration, les choix et la révision des décisions de gestion stratégique et tactique de marché. Cet article explique ce qu’est une théorie des affaires et présente sa place, son rôle et ses bienfaits dans la toile des décisions de gestion. Une bonne théorie des affaires est fort pratique car, par sa validité, elle favorise à la fois efficience et efficacité, permettant d’éviter des dérapages commerciaux dispendieux, voire tragiques. Plusieurs exemples sont offerts afin de rendre plus conviviale la découverte de cet outil de gestion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.661
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGestionSame topicBusiness Strategy and InnovationFrench-language works237,207