Moment Capacities and Deflection Limits of PFRP Sheet Piles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The structural response of pultruded fiber-reinforced polymer (PFRP) sheet pile panels subjected to a uniform pressure load was investigated. Single, connected, and concrete-backfilled panels were tested to ultimate failure in an attempt to determine their moment capacities, deflection limits, and failure mechanisms. The load-carrying capacity of single-panel FRP piles was found to be 15% higher than that of three panels connected together. No pin and eye joint separation was observed at failure. The concrete backfilled hybrid panels exhibited significantly increased moment capacity. However, the increase in stiffness after the first concrete crack was, at best, only 76% over the pile without backfill. Bearing failure of a PFRP pile with a partially confined support created excessive deflection in the wall, but showed no significant reduction in the load capacity. On the other hand, with fully confined support, the ultimate failure of single, connected, and concrete-backfilled panels was dominated by local buckling, longitudinal tearing, and bearing crush at shear keys, upon reaching a deflection limit of span/50.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".