MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2063737727 · doi:10.1243/09544062jmes514

Kinematics of a partially decoupled <i>3R2T</i> symmetrical parallel manipulator 3-RCRR

2008· article· en· W2063737727 on OpenAlexfundno aff
S-J Zhu, Zhen Huang, Mingyao Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersReseau canadien de recherche respiratoireNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsKinematicsParallel manipulatorBionicsControl theory (sociology)SingularityPosition (finance)IsotropyComputer scienceWorkspaceMotion (physics)Realization (probability)AccelerationMathematicsTopology (electrical circuits)PhysicsMathematical analysisClassical mechanicsControl (management)RobotArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 3R2T (three rotational and two independent translational degree of freedom (DoF)) symmetrical parallel manipulator may be adopted in bionics, for example, simulating the motion of a cervical spine based on their mobility property and performance close to isotropic limit. However, up to now, characteristics of this class of manipulators have not been well studied because of its short history. Hence, to study the feasibility of this class of manipulator for bionics, kinematics for 3-RCRR is analysed including position, singularity, velocity, and acceleration. Different from other 3R2T 5-DoF symmetrical parallel manipulators, the mobility of 3-RCRR is partially decoupled, which makes the realization of control system easier than in others.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.570
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering ScienceSame topicRobotic Mechanisms and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207