MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2063741084 · doi:10.1021/ma0209444

Spectral and Photophysical Properties of Fluorene-Based Polyesters in Solution and in the Solid State

2002· article· en· W2063741084 on OpenAlexaff
T. Soujanya, Michel Belletête, Nicolas Drolet, Mario Leclerc, Gilles Durocher

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOrganic Electronics and Photovoltaics
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolyesterExcimerPhotoluminescencePhotochemistryFluorescenceFluoreneIntermolecular forceMaterials scienceThin filmQuenching (fluorescence)ExcitonPolymerMoleculeChemistryOrganic chemistryNanotechnologyOpticsOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The optical and photophysical properties of fluorene-based polyesters in solution and in the solid state (thin films) are reported. The red-shifted emission bands observed in the photoluminescence spectra of the thin films are rationalized in terms of stronger π−π intermolecular interactions due to the closeness of the molecules (molecular packing) in the solid state. This is further corroborated by time-resolved fluorescence decay measurements. However, these electronic interactions are not strong enough to induce excimer or aggregate formation. As such, the quenching excimer and/or aggregate deactivation channel found in many polymeric systems are less efficient in the present polyesters. As expected, the presence of ester linkages between adjacent oligomers causes an interruption of the electronic conjugation, thus limiting the fluorescence to the blue region. The fluorescence efficiencies of thin films, estimated from lifetime measurements of the polyesters in solution and in the solid state, are relatively high (10−25%). Hence, these materials are promising candidates in the fabrication of blue-emitting LED devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromoleculesSame topicOrganic Electronics and PhotovoltaicsFrench-language works237,207