MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2063747917 · doi:10.2166/wst.2009.625

Nutrient removal in an electrically enhanced membrane bioreactor

2009· article· en· W2063747917 on OpenAlexaff
V. Wei, Jan A. Oleszkiewicz, Maria Elektorowicz

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Science & Technology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMembrane bioreactorBioreactorMembraneWaste managementChemistryEnvironmental scienceEngineeringBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Integration of the membrane bioreactor (MBR) into wastewater treatment facilities has gained popularity in recent years due to increasingly stringent discharge permits. However, up to now no research has been conducted on the combination of nitrification, denitrification and electrochemical phosphorus removal into a MBR system. In this study a novel electrically enhanced MBR (EMBR) system was used. Without pH adjustment and external carbon source supplementation, using synthetic feed, ammonium-nitrogen was completely eliminated; COD, total nitrogen and ortho-phosphorus were removed by 94.3%, 77% and 86.6%, respectively. The power consumption was 0.22 kW/m(3) of the influent synthetic wastewater. With a control MBR run in parallel, the applied voltage gradient of 1.82 V/cm did not exhibit adverse influence on the microbial growth. This system has the potential to achieve phosphorus removal through alternating the direct current intensity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWater Science & TechnologySame topicWastewater Treatment and Nitrogen RemovalFrench-language works237,207