L’accès à l’indemnisation pour les incapacités attribuables aux lésions psychiques et aux lésions musculo-squelettiques liées au travail au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article examines the application of the Quebec workers’ compensation scheme to two health problems whose causes are often multi-factorial: mental health problems and musculo-skeletal disorders. After presenting policy governing acceptance of these claims by the workers’ compensation board (CSST), and certain specific obstacles to compensation, the author examines the application of Quebec social policy and suggests why these work-related health problems are often not declared. Quebec compensation legislation covers all injury and illness that can be shown to be either an occupational illness or caused by a work-related accident. Other Canadian provinces have excluded mental health problems attributable to chronic stress from the purview of their legislation. While these cases are covered by workers’ compensation in Quebec, the number of such claims is relatively low, although this is not true for musculoskeletal disorders. The author concludes that policy choices regarding access to compensation, in the context of universal health insurance, may favour under-reporting of these injuries to the CSST, a phenomenon that may have serious repercussions on prevention strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".