MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2063776968 · doi:10.1109/isspit.2007.4458107

Linearly Constrained Adaptive Echo Cancellation for Discrete Multitone Systems

2007· article· en· W2063776968 on OpenAlexaff
Neda Ehtiati, Benoı̂t Champagne

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital subscriber lineEcho (communications protocol)Computer scienceFrequency domainAdaptive filterAlgorithmElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineeringComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Achieving the full duplex transmission in digital subscriber lines (DSL) is possible by using echo cancellation methods. Most of the methods available for echo cancellation, in DSL systems based on the discrete multitone (DMT) modulation, deploy partial echo cancellation in the time and frequency domain. In these systems, the weights of the FIR filter emulating the echo in the time domain are mapped from the frequency-domain adaptive echo weights. This mapping can be regarded as a linear constraint on an extended weight vector containing weights in the time and frequency domain, and echo cancellation can then be regarded as a linearly constrained optimization on this extended linear space. In this paper, linearly constrained adaptive echo cancellation for DMT-based DSL systems is proposed. Two approaches are introduced based on the adaptive algorithms by Frost and by Griffiths. The proposed structure provides a unifying and flexible framework for echo cancellation in different DSL systems. Furthermore, in the proposed method the proper choice of the constraint can address the drifting problem in the presence of the narrow band noise in the DSL systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering TechniquesFrench-language works237,207