MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2063780528 · doi:10.1300/j087v39n01_03

Grandmother-Grandchild Contacts Before and After an Adult Daughter's Divorce

2003· article· en· W2063780528 on OpenAlexaff
Marion F. Ehrenberg, S. Tracie L. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Divorce & Remarriage · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIntergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrandparentPsychologyGrandchildDaughterFeelingDevelopmental psychologySeparation (statistics)DemographySocial psychologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Studies of parents and children in divorcing families have demonstrated grandparents' positive influences on children's adjustment. Few studies considered the grandparents' perspectives on relationships with their grandchildren following divorce. Twenty-five maternal grandmothers with divorced adult daughters were interviewed about their contacts with grandchildren before and after separation; 25 demographically similar grandmothers comprised the control group. As expected, grandmothers reported increases in face-to-face contacts with their grandchildren after separation, but not in other contact types. Overall grandmothers' satisfaction with these contacts and their feelings of responsibility toward grandchildren remained constant pre- and post-separation. Of implication for family practitioners, positive attitudes were enhanced when visits together with grandchildren AND daughters were maintained even as contacts with the grandchildren ALONE became more frequent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Divorce & RemarriageSame topicIntergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingFrench-language works237,207