MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W206381253

Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI symposium on Engineering interactive computing systems

2009· article· en· W206381253 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicUsability and User Interface Design
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceUsabilityUser interfaceInteractive systems engineeringInteractive computingSoftware engineeringInterface (matter)Human–computer interactionWorld Wide WebUser interface designProgramming language
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is our great pleasure to welcome you to the inaugural ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems -- EICS 2009. Peoples' choices as to what products they use--from cars to games to word processors--are increasingly determined by the human factors of the software they contain. Yet much has yet to be learned about how best to include usability considerations into the software design and development process. To address this problem, EICS 2009 serves as a forum for innovative engineering approaches that enhance the usability and entertainment value of interactive systems. This year's symposium brings together people from all over the world who study or practice the engineering of interactive systems, drawing from the Human-Computer Interaction, Software Engineering, Requirements Engineering, Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Ubiquitous / Pervasive Systems and Game Development communities. EICS is the continuation of the successful EHCI (Engineering of Human Computer Interaction) series of conferences sponsored by IFIP Working Group 2.7/13.4. In addition, EICS 2009 incorporates the 16th International Workshop on the Design, Specification and Verification of Interactive Systems (DSV-IS 2009). The EICS 2009 program consists of 19 full papers and 18 late breaking results papers. These cover topics ranging over the software engineering of interactive systems, including model-based user interface development, user interface architecture, development toolkits, novel input techniques, formal techniques, and user interface evaluation. The conference begins with a doctoral consortium chaired by Jean Vanderdonckt, where seven promising students will receive critique and feedback of their work from a panel of experts. The published papers hail from a total of 18 countries and five continents. In addition, keynote addresses will be offered from Frank Maurer and Brad Myers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.668
Threshold uncertainty score0.323

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUsability and User Interface DesignFrench-language works237,207