MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2063836047 · doi:10.1109/jetcas.2013.2256819

Geometry-Based Object Association and Consistent Labeling in Multi-Camera Surveillance

2013· article· en· W2063836047 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer visionArtificial intelligenceObject (grammar)HomographyComputer scienceCamera resectioningField of viewObject detectionGround planeCamera auto-calibrationAssociation (psychology)Plane (geometry)Constraint (computer-aided design)Computer graphics (images)GeometryMathematicsPattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a multi-camera surveillance framework based on multiple view geometry. We address the problem of object association and consistent labeling through exploring geometrical correspondences of objects, not only in sequential frames from a single camera view but also across multiple camera views. The cameras are geometrically related through joint combination of multi-camera calibration, ground plane homography constraint, and field-of-view lines. Object detection is implemented using an adaptive Gaussian mixture model, and thereafter the information obtained from different cameras is fused so that the same object shown in different views can be assigned a unique label. Meanwhile, a virtual top-view of ground plane is synthesized to explicitly display the corresponding location and label of each detected object within a designated area-of-interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.226
Threshold uncertainty score0.547

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it