MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2063865522 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2013.6567818

Automated verification of AUML based multi-agent system design

2013· article· en· W2063865522 on OpenAlexaff
Seyedehmehrnaz Mireslami, Behrouz H. Far

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMulti-Agent Systems and Negotiation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnified Modeling LanguageComputer scienceSequence diagramUML toolApplications of UMLMulti-agent systemSoftware engineeringAgent-oriented software engineeringSoftwareSystems engineeringSoftware developmentArtificial intelligenceProgramming languageEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Industrial demands for agent-based software engineering have significantly increased in the past years. To detect and address the unexpected failures in early design stage of multi-agent systems, several methodologies have been proposed. Agent UML (AUML) is a methodology for agent-based software development that is an extension of the widely accepted UML. AUML handles the interactions among agents by extending UML in dealing with agent-based challenges. In this paper, Agent UML is employed for designing multi-agent systems. A set of conversion rules is proposed to convert Agent UML methodology into UML sequence diagrams that can be used for behavior model synthesis. Then, an automated tool is developed for multiagent system verification that can replace the existing adhoc methods. To validate the proposed methods, a case study of a Real-Time Fleet Management System is used.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMulti-Agent Systems and NegotiationFrench-language works237,207