MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2063868897 · doi:10.1109/pesgm.2012.6345610

Dynamic performance of average-value models for multi-terminal VSC-HVDC systems

2012· article· en· W2063868897 on OpenAlexaff
J. Peralta, Hani Saad, S. Dennetière

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvertersVoltage sourceComputer scienceElectric power systemTransient (computer programming)Electronic engineeringTerminal (telecommunication)Control engineeringPower (physics)EngineeringVoltageElectrical engineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Voltage Source Converter (VSC) HVDC technologies present a bright opportunity in a variety of fields within the power system industry due to their recognized advantages in comparison to conventional line-commutated HVDC systems. Computational burden introduced by detailed modeling of VSC-HVDC systems in EMT-type programs complicates the study of transient events. Detailed modeling includes the representation of semiconductor switches and causes significant deterioration in computational speed. This paper presents the concept of average-value modeling applied to two- and three-level VSC-HVDC systems. The modeling approach is validated for a multi-terminal VSC-based HVDC system used to integrate off-shore wind generation. Dynamic performance simulation results using average-value models are compared against detailed model results. Some results are also presented for MMC converters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations63
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHVDC Systems and Fault ProtectionFrench-language works237,207