Transonic viscous inviscid interactions in narrow channels
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Unsteady as well as steady transonic flows through channels which are so narrow that the classical boundary layer approach fails are considered. As a consequence the properties of the inviscid core and the viscosity dominated boundary layer region can no longer be determined in subsequent steps but have to be calculated simultaneously. The resulting interaction problem for laminar flows is formulated for both perfect and dense gases under the requirement that the channel is sufficiently narrow so that the flow outside the viscous wall layers becomes one‐dimensional in the leading order approximation. The latter allows an interpretation of the flow in the core region by means of the theory of one‐dimensional transonic inviscid flow through a Laval nozzle while preserving the essential features of the interaction problem associated with the internal structure of pseudoshocks. The sensitivity of a separation bubble caused by a pseudoshock of sufficient strength to perturbations under the condition of choked flow will be demonstrated. (© 2008 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it