MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2063921364 · doi:10.1002/polb.22369

Absorption and engulfing transitions in nanoparticle infiltration into a polymer brush: A monte carlo simulation

2011· article· en· W2063921364 on OpenAlexaff
Yantao Chen, Jeff Z. Y. Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Polymer Science Part B Polymer Physics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Surface Interaction Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBrushPolymerPolymer brushNanoparticleMonte Carlo methodMaterials scienceChemical physicsNanotechnologyPolymer chemistryChemical engineeringComposite materialChemistryPolymerization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We study the structure of an infiltrating hard spherical nanoparticle into a polymer brush using extensive off‐lattice Monte Carlo simulations of a basic theoretical model. We show that as long as the spherical particle is coated with a surface layer that interacts attractively with brush monomers, it can penetrate deeply into a dense polymer brush near the grafting surface. The infiltration process contains two stages: diffusing nanoparticle absorbing onto the surface of the polymer brush and engulfing of the nanoparticle by polymer chains. After the nanoparticle fully immerses in the dense polymer brush region, the buoyant forces levels off because of symmetric repulsions that endows increasing nanoparticle mobility and encourages the second transition. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys, 2011

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Polymer Science Part B Polymer PhysicsSame topicPolymer Surface Interaction StudiesFrench-language works237,207