MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2063959448 · doi:10.3828/bjcs.18.1.2

Articulating the 'Canadian Way': Canada™ and the Political Manipulation of the Canadian Identity

2005· article· en· W2063959448 on OpenAlex
Richard Nimijean

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Canadian Studies · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSummitProsperityTrademarkExcellencePoliticsPolitical sciencePrime ministerIdentity (music)Public administrationLawGeographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To maximize opportunity for all Canadians. To invest in their hopes and their dreams. To ensure that our quality of life remains a global model. To make the Maple Leaf a 21st century trademark for excellence. (Prime Minister Jean Chrétien's Canada Day message, 1 July 2002, emphasis added)Ladies and gentlemen, the message I bring is simple, Canada remains on the cutting edge of new opportunities. We are making the Maple Leaf a 21st century trademark for excellence and prosperity. And, we offer cohesive, dynamic communities. Open for business, and ready to welcome your investment. (Address by Prime Minister Jean Chrétien on the occasion of the APEC 2002 CEO summit, 26 October 2002, Los Cabos, Mexico, emphasis added)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.795
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it