The spectrum of singlet SiH<sub>2</sub>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report a theoretical study of the two lowest singlet electronic states ([Formula: see text]1A1 and Ã1B1) of silylene SiH2. These states become degenerate as a 1Δg state at linear configurations and are subject to the Renner effect. In ab initio calculations we have determined the potential energy and dipole moment surfaces for each state, and the transition moment surface between the states. Parameterized analytical functions have been fitted through the various sets of ab initio points, and the parameter values obtained for the potential energy surfaces have been further refined in fittings to experimental spectroscopic data. In these latter fittings, we use as input data experimentally derived energy differences together with ab initio points. In this manner, we achieve refined potential energy surfaces that behave reasonably also in regions of configuration space that are not sampled by the wavefunctions of the states for which experimentally derived energies are available. The calculation of rovibronic energies, the fittings to experimentally derived energies, and simulations of Ã1B1 → [Formula: see text]1A1 emission spectra of SiH2 have been carried out with the RENNER program system. The higher excited vibrational states of [Formula: see text]1A1 SiH2 form polyads of heavily interacting states and many polyad states have been observed in dispersed fluorescence studies. The present theoretical work shows that owing to the heavy interaction between the states in the polyads, it is difficult to obtain unambiguous assignments for them.Key words: silylene, RENNER, ab initio.PACS Nos.: 31.15.Ar, 33.20.Wr, 33.20.Ea
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".