L’évaluation des premiers mois d’implantation d’un réseau de services intégrés aux personnes âgées en perte d’autonomie
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nous décrivons dans cet article l’appréciation des gestionnaires de cas des premiers mois d’implantation d’un réseau de services intégrés aux personnes âgées en perte d’autonomie (RSIPÂPA) sur le territoire de Québec-Centre. La gestion de cas a été assumée principalement par des travailleuses sociales oeuvrant en CLSC. Les résultats font état d’un certain nombre de difficultés d’ordres organisationnel et opérationnel rencontrées par les gestionnaires de cas dans l’application de leur mandat et l’implantation du RSIPÂPA. Ces difficultés ont un impact direct sur les cliniciennes, sur leurs collaborateurs, ainsi que sur les usagers engagés dans le projet et recevant leurs services. Le modèle de gestion de cas initialement retenu est sérieusement remis en question par ceux et celles qui ont à l’actualiser.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.037 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".