MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064044227 · doi:10.1021/ie0499658

Properties Required to Determine Moisture Transport by Capillarity, Gravity, and Diffusion in Potash Beds

2004· article· en· W2064044227 on OpenAlexafffund
Ru Gang Chen, Hong Chen, Robert W. Besant, Richard W. Evitts

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicIrrigation Practices and Water Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPotashMoistureParticle sizePorositySaturation (graph theory)Permeability (electromagnetism)Materials scienceDiffusionParticle (ecology)MineralogyMechanicsRange (aeronautics)ChemistryThermodynamicsComposite materialGeologyMetallurgyPhysicsPotassiumMathematicsPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the important properties required to model moisture transfer in granular porous potash fertilizer by capillarity, gravity, and diffusion within a particle bed (i.e., porosity, permeability, specific surface area, and irreducible saturation) are investigated experimentally and theoretically for narrow ranges of particle size. Special attention is directed toward minimizing the uncertainty of each measurement and calculation. The irreducible saturation level (or moisture content) was deduced by using experimental data and theoretical/numerical simulations of moisture movement by capillarity, gravity, and diffusion within a granular potash bed. It is shown that, for a mixture with a wide range of particle sizes, the potash bed properties can be predicted from the properties for each narrow range of particle size in the mixture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchSame topicIrrigation Practices and Water ManagementFrench-language works237,207