Clenshaw-Curtis-Filon-type methods for highly oscillatory Bessel transforms and applications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We consider a Clenshaw–Curtis–Filon-type method for highly oscillatory Bessel transforms. It is based on a special Hermite interpolation polynomial at the Clenshaw–Curtis points that can be efficiently evaluated using O(NlogN) operations, where N is the number of Clenshaw–Curtis points in the interval of integration. Moreover, we derive corresponding error bounds in terms of the frequency and the approximating polynomial. We then show that this method yields an efficient numerical approximation scheme for a class of Volterra integral equations containing highly oscillatory Bessel kernels (a problem for which standard numerical methods fail), and it also allows the study of the asymptotics of the solutions. Numerical examples are used to illustrate the efficiency and accuracy of the Clenshaw–Curtis–Filon-type method for approximating these highly oscillatory integrals and integral equations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it