MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064082346 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2010.5495651

Phone recognition using Restricted Boltzmann Machines

2010· article· en· W2064082346 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMusic and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTIMITHidden Markov modelComputer sciencePhoneConditional independenceBoltzmann machineIndependence (probability theory)Set (abstract data type)Speech recognitionGenerative modelArtificial intelligenceRestricted Boltzmann machineMarkov modelGenerative grammarMachine learningPattern recognition (psychology)Markov chainArtificial neural networkMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For decades, Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) have been the state-of-the-art technique for acoustic modeling despite their unrealistic independence assumptions and the very limited representational capacity of their hidden states. Conditional Restricted Boltzmann Machines (CRBMs) have recently proved to be very effective for modeling motion capture sequences and this paper investigates the application of this more powerful type of generative model to acoustic modeling. On the standard TIMIT corpus, one type of CRBM outperforms HMMs and is comparable with the best other methods, achieving a phone error rate (PER) of 26.7% on the TIMIT core test set.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.823
Threshold uncertainty score0.247

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations108
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMusic and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207