Parathyroid cancer: Outcome analysis of 16 patients treated at the princess margaret hospital
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to discuss the appropriate management options for parathyroid carcinomas, which is still a subject of controversy. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 16 patients with parathyroid carcinoma was undertaken to determine the clinical outcome. RESULTS: All patients were initially treated with surgery, and 11 patients received adjuvant radiotherapy. The 5- and 10-year disease-specific survival rates were 100% and 80%, respectively; the 5- and 10-year disease-free survival rates were 69% and 43%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year locoregional control rates were 69% and 52%, respectively; the 5- and 10-year distant control rates were 89% and 74%, respectively. In this cohort, none of the clinicopathologic parameters could be defined as a predictor. CONCLUSION: In patients with parathyroid carcinoma, definition of prognostic factors and the role of adjuvant radiation treatment has still to be elucidated. Nevertheless, angioinvasion and positive resection margins are critical factors regarding disease-free survival in patients with parathyroid carcinomas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".