MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064096493 · doi:10.1007/s13213-010-0137-x

16S rRNA gene sequence analysis of halophilic and halotolerant bacteria isolated from a hypersaline pond in Sichuan, China

2010· article· en· W2064096493 on OpenAlexaff
Jie Tang, Aiping Zheng, Eden S. P. Bromfield, Jun Zhu, Shuangcheng Li, Shiquan Wang, Qiming Deng, Ping Li

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Microbiology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHalotoleranceHalophileHalomonasBiologyFirmicutesGammaproteobacteria16S ribosomal RNAExtremophileMicrobiologyBotanyBacteriaSalinityEcologyMicroorganismGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One hundred and twenty bacterial isolates were obtained from a hypersaline pond (c. 22% salinity) in Sichuan, China. Bacteria were isolated from hypersaline water, sediment and soil samples using three culture media and an incubation temperature of 37°C. Of these isolates, 47 were selected and examined by phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences and by tests of salt tolerance. The phylogenetic analysis placed the 47 bacterial isolates either in the phylum Firmicutes or in the class Gammaproteobacteria and showed that they were affiliated with the genera Salimicrobium, Halalkalibacillus, Virgibacillus, Alkalibacillus, Marinococcus, Halobacillus, Halomonas, Idiomarina, Chromohalobacter and Halovibrio. All tested isolates were either halophilic or halotolerant and several were capable of growth in the presence of 30% (w/v) NaCl.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of MicrobiologySame topicMicrobial Community Ecology and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207