MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064099743 · doi:10.1139/l07-024

In situ jet-testing of the erosional resistance of cohesive streambeds

2007· article· en· W2064099743 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
D.S. Shugar, Ray Kostaschuk, Peter Ashmore, Joe Desloges, Leif M. Burge

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil erosion and sediment transport
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeotechnical engineeringShear stressGeologySTREAMSJet (fluid)ErosionHydrology (agriculture)SedimentShear (geology)Flood mythEnvironmental scienceGeomorphologyGeographyEngineeringMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fletcher’s Creek is located in an urbanizing basin near Toronto and has a bed and banks composed primarily of cohesive Halton Till. Critical shear stress and an erodibility coefficient for the till were determined using an in situ jet-tester that directs a submerged jet of water perpendicular to the sediment surface. The results from 10 jet-tests indicate that the till has a relatively low critical shear stress and relatively high erodibility coefficient and could be susceptible to bed scour during flood events. Many other streams in southern Ontario have urbanizing watersheds with cohesive till beds that may also be susceptible to erosion.Key words: critical stress, submerged jet, erodibility, cohesive soils.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicSoil erosion and sediment transportFrench-language works237,207