MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064127059 · doi:10.1119/1.3427412

Magnetic multipolar contact fields: The anapole and related moments

2010· article· en· W2064127059 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSolar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaRussian Foundation for Basic Research
KeywordsMultipole expansionPhysicsDipoleSpherical multipole momentsHyperfine structureMagnetic momentMagnetic dipoleFast multipole methodForce between magnetsField (mathematics)Moment (physics)MagnetismQuantum electrodynamicsQuadrupoleMagnetic fieldCondensed matter physicsClassical mechanicsQuantum mechanicsMagnetic energyMagnetization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We derive the multipole expansion of the magnetostatic field due to a localized current distribution, including contact terms up to the octopole term. Because of the contact fields, new multipole moments arise compared to the multipole expansion of just the external field. For the quadrupolar contact field, the new multipole moment is the anapole moment. For the octopolar contact field two new multipole moments arise, only one of which has been discussed previously. We discuss the dipolar, quadrupolar, and octopolar contact fields and the corresponding new multipole moments and give some applications to an extension of Jackson’s theorems for mean magnetic fields, parity violation and the anapole moment, lunar magnetism, and hyperfine interactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.538
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it