MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064137853 · doi:10.1144/m40.8

Chapter 8 The rock coast of Canada

2014· article· en· W2064137853 on OpenAlexaffabout
Alan S. Trenhaile

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society London Memoirs · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyShoreOceanographyCoastal erosionSubmarine pipelineContext (archaeology)GlacierSeabed gouging by iceErosionGlacial periodEarth scienceGeomorphologySea iceAntarctic sea icePaleontologyArctic ice pack

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Canada's coasts, which are primarily rocky, extend along three oceans and four Great Lakes. Many processes operate here in the same way as in other places, but glacio-isostatic uplift, coastal permafrost and ground and sea ice assume particular importance in the Canadian context. Only small amounts of wave erosion have occurred on the very resistant rocks of the Canadian Shield, where rapid changes in relative sea-level have limited the time that marine processes operated at any particular level. The Pacific coast and most of the northern Atlantic coast consist of fiords and most steep coastal slopes have been cut by glaciers. Marine processes have been more effective on weaker substrates in southern Canada, where there are a variety of stacks, arches, wave-eroded cliffs and wide shore platforms. Most work has been conducted on the southern Great Lakes, where rapid erosion and recession of glacial clay cliffs threaten human populations and infrastructure, and on the subhorizontal and sloping shore platforms of Atlantic Canada and eastern Québec.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.417

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0070.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1250.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society London MemoirsSame topicClimate change and permafrostFrench-language works237,207