MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064145927 · doi:10.2524/jtappij.63.1475

A Report on 2009 International Conference on Nanotechnology for the Forest Products Industry

2009· article· en· W2064145927 on OpenAlexaff
Shiho Katsukawa

Bibliographic record

VenueJAPAN TAPPI JOURNAL · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced Cellulose Research Studies
Canadian institutionsNational Institute for Nanotechnology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEngineeringForest industryNanotechnologyBusinessForestryMaterials scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

2009年6月22日から26日に,TAPPI主催の2009International Conference on Nanotechnology for the Forest Products Industryが,カナダ,アルバータ州エドモントンにて開催された。この会議は今回で4回目となり,12カ国から180名を超える参加があった。ナノサイズの物質の物性や,その製造・利用技術,分析法,安全性の評価など,紙・パルプや木材分野におけるナノテクノロジーについての研究発表(口頭45件,ポスター20件)や講演,パネルディスカッションが行われた。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.163

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0490.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAPAN TAPPI JOURNALSame topicAdvanced Cellulose Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207