MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064158327 · doi:10.5020/18061230.2013.p166

Influência do tempo de prática de exercício físico na composição corporal: experiência do programa de educação pelo trabalho para a saúde

2013· article· pt· W2064158327 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carminda Goersch Lamboglia, Mônica Helena Neves Pereira Pinheiro, Kristiane Mesquita Barros Franchi, Luciana Leite Pequeno

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Brasileira em Promoção da saúde · 2013
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPhysical Education and Gymnastics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversidade de Fortaleza
KeywordsHumanitiesPsychologyMedicinePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objetivo: Analisar a influência do tempo de prática de exercício físico na composição corporal de mulheres. Métodos: Estudo quase experimental e com delineamento ex post facto. A amostra foi composta por 61 mulheres, com idades acima de 40 anos, que participavam de um programa de exercícios promovido pelo Programa de Educação pelo Trabalho para a Saúde (PET-Saúde), da Universidade de Fortaleza, sendo divididas em dois grupos: Grupo 1 - Caso (praticavam exercício físico há, no mínimo, 6 meses) e Grupo 2 - Controle (praticavam exercício há menos de 6 meses). Foram avaliadas medidas de peso, estatura, índice de massa corporal, circunferências da cintura e do quadril e de composição corporal (bioimpedância modelo 310). Para os parâmetros de saúde, utilizou-se o Canadian Standardized Test of Fitness. Realizou-se o tratamento estatístico através da análise descritiva (média e desvio padrão) e inferencial (Independente-Sample T e One-Sample T Test). O nível de significância adotado foi de p

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.259
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Brasileira em Promoção da saúdeSame topicPhysical Education and GymnasticsFrench-language works237,207