APPLICATION OF INVERSE BROYDEN'S METHOD FOR COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS OF HYDROGEN CONTRIBUTION TO THE NEAR-NEUTRAL PH STRESS CORROSION CRACKING
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An Inverse Broyden's Method was applied in the context of a molecular statics approach for the analysis of the contribution of hydrogen to the near-neutral pH stress corrosion cracking. A 3D crystal structure was tested numerically. It is shown that the Inverse Broyden's Method provides a computationally efficient technique to evaluate the effect of hydrogen on the material degradation. Simulation results demonstrated that atoms of hydrogen placed near the crack tip produced a strong effect on deformation and crack propagation in bcc iron leading to a 15–20% loss in a residual strength of numerically tested samples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it