The Effect of Wheelchair Use on the Quality of Life of Persons with Multiple Sclerosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY This pilot study describes the effect of wheelchair use on the quality of life of persons with multiple sclerosis (MS), and examines the clinical utility of the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) as an outcome measure for use by occupational therapists. Sixteen hospitalized adults with MS were interviewed using the PIADS. Descriptive comparisons of PIADS subscale scores (competence, adaptability, self-esteem) were conducted for participants using different types of wheelchairs, daily versus non-daily wheelchair users, and participants who required different levels of assistance to propel their wheelchairs. Results suggest that using a wheelchair has a positive impact on the quality of life of persons with MS. The PIADS was found to be clinically useful for exploring person-environment interactions and appears to be well suited to the goals and values of occupational therapy. Recommendations for future research and for incorporating the PIADS into occupational therapy practice are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".