MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064230145 · doi:10.1002/masy.201200039

Solvent Effects in Semibatch Free Radical Copolymerization of 2‐Hydroxyethyl methacrylate and Styrene at High Temperatures

2013· article· en· W2064230145 on OpenAlex
Kun Liang, Robin A. Hutchinson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Symposia · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolymer chemistryMonomerBranching (polymer chemistry)CopolymerStyreneMethacrylateSolventPolymerPolymerizationRadical polymerizationMaterials scienceChemistry(Hydroxyethyl)methacrylateOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract High temperature semibatch free radical copolymerizations of 2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) and styrene (ST) were carried out in xylene and DMF solution. Experimental free monomer and polymer molecular weight (MW) profiles at different temperatures and solvent concentrations are compared to those for ST polymerized with butyl methacrylate (BMA). Solvent choice, through its influence on hydrogen bonding of HEMA monomer, has a significant impact on the polymerization that is not seen for the corresponding ST/BMA reactions. The weight‐average polymer MWs of ST/HEMA are unusually high (>40 kg/mol), a result of branching reactions involving dimethacrylate impurity contained in HEMA monomer. The importance of these branching reactions is also influenced by solvent choice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.962

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it