MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064242782 · doi:10.2118/145052-ms

Increasing Cold Lake Recovery by Adapting Steamflood Principles to a Bitumen Reservoir

2011· article· en· W2064242782 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Conference · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsImperial Oil (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsphaltSteam injectionOil sandsPetroleum engineeringPetroleumGeologyReservoir engineeringEnergy sourceEnvironmental scienceEnhanced oil recovery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Cold Lake project, located in Alberta, Canada, is the world’s largest heavy oil in situ thermal development, with production of about 24,000 m3/d (150 kB/d) of oil from more than 4500 wells. In 2009, Cold Lake produced its one billionth barrel (160 million m3) of heavy oil. The world class Cold Lake hydrocarbon resource is characterized as a bitumen deposit, featuring in situ viscosities in excess of 100,000 mPa-s. Early depletion plans envisioned a thermal recovery process similar to the steamflood technologies employed to recover heavy oil in California’s San Joaquin Valley. The order of magnitude difference between Cold Lake and California in-situ viscosities, however, severely limits steam injectivity below fracture pressure, necessitating the development of a Cold Lake specific cyclic steam stimulation (CSS) process throughout the 1980s. Continual process optimization combined with infill drilling has resulted in a progressive increase in expected bitumen recovery from 13% to greater than 40% of effective bitumen in place (EBIP). A multi-disciplinary reservoir management effort conducted over the last several years has provided the view that Cold Lake recovery levels may potentially be increased to over 65% by adapting steamflood principles to mature CSS areas of the reservoir: reservoir simulation was used to define the steamflood opportunity’s technical and economic viabilityan extensive selection process based on several criteria was used to select an appropriate field trial locationtrial plans were reviewed with experts with California steamflood experiencea Cold Lake steamflood field trail was designed, implemented and successfully operated for three years As cyclic process efficiency declines due to lack of steam confinement, steamflood technologies become an attractive recovery scheme in mature Cold Lake reservoir by capitalizing on large scale inter-well communication while focusing on gravity drainage: trial results to date are encouraging and in agreement with performance predictionssuccess to date has benefited from the evaluation of prior trails at Cold Lake, review of global steamflood analogs and extensive reservoir simulation efforts prior to field trial design and implementationsteam confinement is a significant but manageable operational challenge

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.559
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it