L'émergence du domaine d'étude de la communication interculturelle
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette réflexion sur le champ de recherche en communication interculturelle part du principe que les avancées théoriques s’élaborent au travers d’une dynamique ancrée autant dans le contexte des pratiques de recherche que dans l’évolution interne du champ de recherche. Tout d’abord, on tente de délimiter les moments clés qui ont présidé à l’émergence de ce nouveau domaine des deux côtés de l’Atlantique. Une fois établi que la communication interculturelle est un nouveau champ de recherche où se constituent un langage, des théories et des méthodologies qui lui sont propres, la deuxième étape consistera à dresser la carte de son territoire, autrement dit, à préciser quels sont les objets, les approches et les postures méthodologiques qui coexistent dans ce champ.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it