MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2064257426 · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(05)64495-3

Re: Laparoscopic Excision of a Seminal Vesicle for the Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome

2002· letter· en· W2064257426 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stanley J. Antolak

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Urology · 2002
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePelvic painProstatitisMEDLINEPathologicalChronic painGeneral surgeryGynecologySurgeryProstatePhysical therapyInternal medicineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

No AccessJournal of UrologyCLINICAL UROLOGY: Letters to the Editor1 Oct 2002Re: Laparoscopic Excision of a Seminal Vesicle for the Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome Stanley J. Antolak Stanley J. AntolakStanley J. Antolak More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64495-3AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "Re: Laparoscopic Excision of a Seminal Vesicle for the Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome." The Journal of Urology, 168(4 Part 1), p. 1505 References 1 : NIH consensus definition and classification of prostatitis. JAMA1999; 282: 236. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 2 : The National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index: development and validation of a new outcome measure. J Urol1999; 162: 369. Link, Google Scholar 3 : A review of clinical and pathological prostatitis syndromes. Urology1997; 49: 809. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 4 : Anatomic basis of chronic perineal pain: role of the pudendal nerve. Surg Radiol Anat1998; 20: 93. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 5 : Ejaculatory pain: association with non-inflammatory urogenital pain: the chronic pelvic pain syndrome, category IIIB chronic prostatitis. Presented at annual meeting of North Central Section, American Urological Association, Chicago, IllinoisSeptember 2002; : 18. Google Scholar 6 : Diagnostic and therapeutic nerve blocks for patients with perineal non-malignant pain. Presented at 8th World Congress on Pain, Vancouver, CanadaAugust 1996; : 17. Google Scholar Department of UrologyMayo Clinic200 First St., SWRochester, Minnesota 55905© 2002 by American Urological Association, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 168Issue 4 Part 1October 2002Page: 1505 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2002 by American Urological Association, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Stanley J. Antolak More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0060.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Urology→Same topicUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research→French-language works237,207→