MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064258688 · doi:10.1353/mod.0.0166

Editing Modernity: Women and Little-Magazine Cultures in Canada, 1916–1956 (review)

2010· article· en· W2064258688 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueModernism/modernity · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModernityAnecdotePoetryModernism (music)GlobePrint cultureLiterary magazineArt historyHistoryArtMedia studiesLiteratureSociologyLiterary criticismPolitical scienceLawPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Editing Modernity: Women and Little-Magazine Cultures in Canada, 1916–1956 Andrew Thacker Editing Modernity: Women and Little-Magazine Cultures in Canada, 1916–1956. Dean Irvine. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008. Pp. xvi + 345. $55.00 (cloth). In 1941 a new "little magazine" of poetry, Contemporary Verse, was founded in Vancouver, inspired by the example of Harriet Monroe's classic magazine, Poetry, started in Chicago in 1912. Alan Crawley, editor of the Canadian magazine, not only took Poetry as a point of reference for the new journal, but encouraged poets to send their best pieces to the American magazine first; if rejected there, they were then encouraged by Crawley to submit the work to Contemporary Verse. Dean Irvine, in this excellent contribution to the burgeoning work on modernist periodicals, interprets this incident as the editor "opening lines of communication between poets and [End Page 242] magazine editors in Canada and the United States" (81). It does indeed indicate how networks 243 of little magazines spread throughout the first half of the twentieth century, fostering modernist experimentation across nations and continents. This anecdote, however, with its whiff of a centre/ periphery relationship between the literary culture of the United States and that of Canada, also points to the more general issue of how the modernist little magazine as a generic form of publication spread across the globe, and of how this movement, across the diverse geographies of modernism, was inflected by individual national cultures. One approach to the story of the little magazine form's migration would be to use a model of modernist uneven development, whereby modernism in certain countries comes belatedly to attention with the founding of their first "little magazine." Ken Norris's account of Canadian little magazines takes this approach with its opening claim: "Modernism is a development that came comparatively late to Canadian poetry and became the dominant mode in the 1940s."1 Although he acknowledges some activity in periodicals from the 1920s, Norris reiterates that it "would not be until the 1940s that Modernism, equipped with embattled little magazines, would re-enact the cultural drama in Canadian terms. It can also be argued that it was not until the 1960s that avant-garde literary magazines began to appear in Canada."2 One of the strengths of Irvine's volume is that he offers an alternative narrative to the notion of belatedness represented in Norris's book, offering informative accounts of earlier magazines (ignored by Norris) such as Flora MacDonald Denison's Sunset of Bon Echo (1916–20), Toronto's liberal arts monthly Twentieth Century (1932–33), the left-wing magazine Masses (1932–34), or Crucible (1932–43), a cultural nationalist magazine committed to experimental work by "those who are in the process of 'becoming,'" as an inaugural editorial suggested (207). Irvine's aim, however, is not only to revise the orthodox accounts of the little magazine in Canada, but to also to reintegrate women's contributions to the making of these, and many other, periodicals. For Irvine critical accounts such as those of Norris or Louis Dudek have ignored or downplayed the role of women poets and editors in better-known Canadian magazines such as Preview (1942–45), First Statement (1942–45), or Contemporary Verse (1941–52). This has contributed, argues Irvine, to the dominance of a masculinist view of Canadian modernism and its little magazines, one that certain feminist literary historians have also adopted. Irvine's work thus aims to displace "the myth of Canadian modernism and its little magazines as masculinist phenomena" with an "alternative literary-historical narrative" (261). The book undoubtedly succeeds in this aim. However, as an account of periodical culture and Canadian modernism the book is not without problems. Although Irvine's account is informed by extensive archival research that should, in turn, stimulate further debate, the way that he has organized some of this material is rather puzzling. After a useful introduction mapping out the field of study, we encounter three chapters organized around the contributions of three female poets to a range of magazines between 1932 and 1956, based in various Canadian cities. Thus, the first chapter explores Dorothy Livesay's contributions to the left...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.533
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it