MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2064258688 · doi:10.1353/mod.0.0166

Editing Modernity: Women and Little-Magazine Cultures in Canada, 1916–1956 (review)

2010· article· en· W2064258688 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andrew Thacker

Bibliographic record

VenueModernism/modernity · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModernityAnecdotePoetryModernism (music)GlobePrint cultureLiterary magazineArt historyHistoryArtMedia studiesLiteratureSociologyLiterary criticismPolitical scienceLawPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Editing Modernity: Women and Little-Magazine Cultures in Canada, 1916–1956 Andrew Thacker Editing Modernity: Women and Little-Magazine Cultures in Canada, 1916–1956. Dean Irvine. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008. Pp. xvi + 345. $55.00 (cloth). In 1941 a new "little magazine" of poetry, Contemporary Verse, was founded in Vancouver, inspired by the example of Harriet Monroe's classic magazine, Poetry, started in Chicago in 1912. Alan Crawley, editor of the Canadian magazine, not only took Poetry as a point of reference for the new journal, but encouraged poets to send their best pieces to the American magazine first; if rejected there, they were then encouraged by Crawley to submit the work to Contemporary Verse. Dean Irvine, in this excellent contribution to the burgeoning work on modernist periodicals, interprets this incident as the editor "opening lines of communication between poets and [End Page 242] magazine editors in Canada and the United States" (81). It does indeed indicate how networks 243 of little magazines spread throughout the first half of the twentieth century, fostering modernist experimentation across nations and continents. This anecdote, however, with its whiff of a centre/ periphery relationship between the literary culture of the United States and that of Canada, also points to the more general issue of how the modernist little magazine as a generic form of publication spread across the globe, and of how this movement, across the diverse geographies of modernism, was inflected by individual national cultures. One approach to the story of the little magazine form's migration would be to use a model of modernist uneven development, whereby modernism in certain countries comes belatedly to attention with the founding of their first "little magazine." Ken Norris's account of Canadian little magazines takes this approach with its opening claim: "Modernism is a development that came comparatively late to Canadian poetry and became the dominant mode in the 1940s."1 Although he acknowledges some activity in periodicals from the 1920s, Norris reiterates that it "would not be until the 1940s that Modernism, equipped with embattled little magazines, would re-enact the cultural drama in Canadian terms. It can also be argued that it was not until the 1960s that avant-garde literary magazines began to appear in Canada."2 One of the strengths of Irvine's volume is that he offers an alternative narrative to the notion of belatedness represented in Norris's book, offering informative accounts of earlier magazines (ignored by Norris) such as Flora MacDonald Denison's Sunset of Bon Echo (1916–20), Toronto's liberal arts monthly Twentieth Century (1932–33), the left-wing magazine Masses (1932–34), or Crucible (1932–43), a cultural nationalist magazine committed to experimental work by "those who are in the process of 'becoming,'" as an inaugural editorial suggested (207). Irvine's aim, however, is not only to revise the orthodox accounts of the little magazine in Canada, but to also to reintegrate women's contributions to the making of these, and many other, periodicals. For Irvine critical accounts such as those of Norris or Louis Dudek have ignored or downplayed the role of women poets and editors in better-known Canadian magazines such as Preview (1942–45), First Statement (1942–45), or Contemporary Verse (1941–52). This has contributed, argues Irvine, to the dominance of a masculinist view of Canadian modernism and its little magazines, one that certain feminist literary historians have also adopted. Irvine's work thus aims to displace "the myth of Canadian modernism and its little magazines as masculinist phenomena" with an "alternative literary-historical narrative" (261). The book undoubtedly succeeds in this aim. However, as an account of periodical culture and Canadian modernism the book is not without problems. Although Irvine's account is informed by extensive archival research that should, in turn, stimulate further debate, the way that he has organized some of this material is rather puzzling. After a useful introduction mapping out the field of study, we encounter three chapters organized around the contributions of three female poets to a range of magazines between 1932 and 1956, based in various Canadian cities. Thus, the first chapter explores Dorothy Livesay's contributions to the left...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.273
Threshold uncertainty score0.550

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0060.014
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModernism/modernitySame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207