MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2064258688 · doi:10.1353/mod.0.0166

Editing Modernity: Women and Little-Magazine Cultures in Canada, 1916–1956 (review)

2010· article· en· W2064258688 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueModernism/modernity · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésModernityAnecdotePoetryModernism (music)GlobePrint cultureLiterary magazineArt historyHistoryArtMedia studiesLiteratureSociologyLiterary criticismPolitical scienceLawPsychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Editing Modernity: Women and Little-Magazine Cultures in Canada, 1916–1956 Andrew Thacker Editing Modernity: Women and Little-Magazine Cultures in Canada, 1916–1956. Dean Irvine. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008. Pp. xvi + 345. $55.00 (cloth). In 1941 a new "little magazine" of poetry, Contemporary Verse, was founded in Vancouver, inspired by the example of Harriet Monroe's classic magazine, Poetry, started in Chicago in 1912. Alan Crawley, editor of the Canadian magazine, not only took Poetry as a point of reference for the new journal, but encouraged poets to send their best pieces to the American magazine first; if rejected there, they were then encouraged by Crawley to submit the work to Contemporary Verse. Dean Irvine, in this excellent contribution to the burgeoning work on modernist periodicals, interprets this incident as the editor "opening lines of communication between poets and [End Page 242] magazine editors in Canada and the United States" (81). It does indeed indicate how networks 243 of little magazines spread throughout the first half of the twentieth century, fostering modernist experimentation across nations and continents. This anecdote, however, with its whiff of a centre/ periphery relationship between the literary culture of the United States and that of Canada, also points to the more general issue of how the modernist little magazine as a generic form of publication spread across the globe, and of how this movement, across the diverse geographies of modernism, was inflected by individual national cultures. One approach to the story of the little magazine form's migration would be to use a model of modernist uneven development, whereby modernism in certain countries comes belatedly to attention with the founding of their first "little magazine." Ken Norris's account of Canadian little magazines takes this approach with its opening claim: "Modernism is a development that came comparatively late to Canadian poetry and became the dominant mode in the 1940s."1 Although he acknowledges some activity in periodicals from the 1920s, Norris reiterates that it "would not be until the 1940s that Modernism, equipped with embattled little magazines, would re-enact the cultural drama in Canadian terms. It can also be argued that it was not until the 1960s that avant-garde literary magazines began to appear in Canada."2 One of the strengths of Irvine's volume is that he offers an alternative narrative to the notion of belatedness represented in Norris's book, offering informative accounts of earlier magazines (ignored by Norris) such as Flora MacDonald Denison's Sunset of Bon Echo (1916–20), Toronto's liberal arts monthly Twentieth Century (1932–33), the left-wing magazine Masses (1932–34), or Crucible (1932–43), a cultural nationalist magazine committed to experimental work by "those who are in the process of 'becoming,'" as an inaugural editorial suggested (207). Irvine's aim, however, is not only to revise the orthodox accounts of the little magazine in Canada, but to also to reintegrate women's contributions to the making of these, and many other, periodicals. For Irvine critical accounts such as those of Norris or Louis Dudek have ignored or downplayed the role of women poets and editors in better-known Canadian magazines such as Preview (1942–45), First Statement (1942–45), or Contemporary Verse (1941–52). This has contributed, argues Irvine, to the dominance of a masculinist view of Canadian modernism and its little magazines, one that certain feminist literary historians have also adopted. Irvine's work thus aims to displace "the myth of Canadian modernism and its little magazines as masculinist phenomena" with an "alternative literary-historical narrative" (261). The book undoubtedly succeeds in this aim. However, as an account of periodical culture and Canadian modernism the book is not without problems. Although Irvine's account is informed by extensive archival research that should, in turn, stimulate further debate, the way that he has organized some of this material is rather puzzling. After a useful introduction mapping out the field of study, we encounter three chapters organized around the contributions of three female poets to a range of magazines between 1932 and 1956, based in various Canadian cities. Thus, the first chapter explores Dorothy Livesay's contributions to the left...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,533
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,238
Écart entre enseignants0,228 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle